Noise: Ce qui fausse notre jugement et comment l'améliorer
- Downloads：5818
- Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
- Create Date：2021-10-06 03:51:05
- Update Date：2025-09-06
- Status：finish
- Author：Daniel Kahneman
- ISBN：273815705X
- Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
- Download
Summary
Dès qu'il y a jugement， il y a bruit。 Quand deux médecins posent des diagnostics différents pour le même patient， quand deux juges attribuent des peines plus ou moins lourdes pour le même crime， quand deux responsables de ressources humaines prennent des décisions opposées à propos d'un candidat à un poste， nous sommes face au bruit。 Daniel Kahneman， Olivier Sibony et Cass R。 Sunstein montrent dans ce livre que le bruit exerce des effets nocifs dans de nombreux domaines : médecine， justice， protection de l'enfance， prévision économique， recrutement， police scientifique， stratégie d'entreprise。。。 Pourtant， le bruit reste méconnu。 Il est la face cachée de l'erreur de jugement。 Noise nous propose des solutions simples et immédiatement opérationnelles pour réduire le bruit dans nos jugements et prendre de meilleures décisions。 Le prochain livre qui va changer votre façon de penser。 Un best-seller mondial。 "Un tour de force d'érudition et de clarté"。 The New York Times "Une leçon d'humilité devant nos erreurs"。 The Financial Times "Tous les chercheurs， les décideurs politiques， les dirigeants et les consultants devraient lire ce livre"。 The Washington Post
Reviews
Maria
，
How professional is professional judgment？ How much variation is there between doctors， judges or insurance adjusters？ Studies also show that individuals make different decisions depending on the weather， time of day or if their sports team won or lose。 These are examples of noise and this variability is larger than we realize。 Why I started this book: Interesting cover。Why I finished it: Interesting but overlong。。。 I need to think about what decision hygiene I need to implement in my own person How professional is professional judgment？ How much variation is there between doctors， judges or insurance adjusters？ Studies also show that individuals make different decisions depending on the weather， time of day or if their sports team won or lose。 These are examples of noise and this variability is larger than we realize。 Why I started this book: Interesting cover。Why I finished it: Interesting but overlong。。。 I need to think about what decision hygiene I need to implement in my own personal and professional life to reduce noise。 。。。more
Saleem
，
This is an excellent book for anyone who wants to understand flaws in decision making and how to improve the quality of important decisions。 It includes a lot of theories and studies about Noise that might affect judgement。 Thinking about “Noise” in decisions can help you identify opportunities to improve decision making and make better， less noisy， decisions。 And this book will get you doing that thinking。 Recommended！！！
Daniel Farabaugh
，
A well written and useful book as it points to an important way to fix a flaw in our judgements and gives real solutions to focusing on it。
Leonard Klar
，
Just like Thinking Fast and Slow it allows a whole new perspective on how humans make decisions/ judgements。
Crecentia Vera
，
Compared to Kahneman’s Thinking Fast and Slow， this one way easier to digest。 The downside for this is it has a lot of repeating stuff with too many pages to make the same point， that’s why i found myself struggling to find the motivation to pick up Noise。 But overall， insightful stuff！
Bob Collins
，
More significant than bias？Well research， well written， with examples from many areas of the law， business， government and life， with recommendations for reducing “noise in judgement。”Recommend。
Ronan Leonard
，
Written by academics for academics。 Really wanted to enjoy this book having enjoyed thinking fast and slow。 Unfortunately this book is aimed at a much more niche audience and lacks any kind of wide ranging practical application except for maybe management consulting。 I found it to be TBU - True but useless。
Bartczukkuba
，
If someone heard about bias in decision making， this book will be interesting as exploration of other component of error。I think in addition to groups explicitly mentioned in the book （law， medicine， management） it should be pretty interesting to anyone with quantitative/engineering background。
Lawrence Lewis
，
Errors in professional judgement is a subject too important to slog thru the data included in this book。
Tom Anichini
，
Necessary information， but probably could have been the length of three or so magazine articles instead。 Lots of overlap/redundancy with Thinking， Fast and Slow。Skip straight to the appendices to get the best out of this book。
Elkanah Oenga
，
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers。 To view it， click here。 Left quite a bit to be desired， compared to Daniel Kahneman's other body of work。 Still an ok read but failed to establish Noise as a new concept because it already existed just went by different terms depending on situation。 Left quite a bit to be desired， compared to Daniel Kahneman's other body of work。 Still an ok read but failed to establish Noise as a new concept because it already existed just went by different terms depending on situation。 。。。more
Emily
，
In fairness， I've ready a LOT of books by Daniel Kahneman and research related to this concept， so I think my biggest issue with this book is that I felt like I already knew everything covered in it。 The information is great， and if this is one's first interaction with it， fantastic。 Otherwise， it felt to me like aggregation of other books and articles he's written and didn't feel worth the time to read。TL;DR: If you haven't read anything by him， this is as good a book as any to start with。 In fairness， I've ready a LOT of books by Daniel Kahneman and research related to this concept， so I think my biggest issue with this book is that I felt like I already knew everything covered in it。 The information is great， and if this is one's first interaction with it， fantastic。 Otherwise， it felt to me like aggregation of other books and articles he's written and didn't feel worth the time to read。TL;DR: If you haven't read anything by him， this is as good a book as any to start with。 。。。more
Sarah
，
It’s indeed hard to listen to at the first one-third of the book。 For me， it was a slow process to understand the idea and define what the authors mean exactly with the « Noise »。I found the idea of « decision hygiene »practical to reduce noise， besides the hidden advice that we should think alone first before involving in a sort of group decision making of any kind or if we are in a position of judgment。The most enjoyable parts in the book are those talking about the application of the « noise It’s indeed hard to listen to at the first one-third of the book。 For me， it was a slow process to understand the idea and define what the authors mean exactly with the « Noise »。I found the idea of « decision hygiene »practical to reduce noise， besides the hidden advice that we should think alone first before involving in a sort of group decision making of any kind or if we are in a position of judgment。The most enjoyable parts in the book are those talking about the application of the « noise » in different disciplines， like medicine， law， and business。 And， I like the interview that comes at the end of the book。 。。。more
Kevin Jennings
，
Kahneman， like with his previous book Thinking Fast and Slow is frustrating when it comes to the category of self enrichment kind of books。 I find the ideas easy to understand and accept but his examples to explain that really like meaning for me （odd I know）。 I think part of the problem for me at least with the concept of Noise is that I have been a big believer in Noise as a problem for a long time （I have back ground in Sociology/History and computer science） so I wasn't that hard to convince Kahneman， like with his previous book Thinking Fast and Slow is frustrating when it comes to the category of self enrichment kind of books。 I find the ideas easy to understand and accept but his examples to explain that really like meaning for me （odd I know）。 I think part of the problem for me at least with the concept of Noise is that I have been a big believer in Noise as a problem for a long time （I have back ground in Sociology/History and computer science） so I wasn't that hard to convince。 I am not sure his examples and studies he uses though we all that enlightening to the fixing the problem。 It seems that this book is written for business management types who need are blinded by noise。 In that that case I guess I would recommend it for people in such organizations that if issues of judgement。 。。。more
Ricardo Urresti
，
Daniel Kahneman discusses the judgement process that is pervasive on our life - from formal trials results to doctors bringing their diagnostic on your headache， there are a lot， a lot of noise in the process to bring results on those scenarios， generating errors and injustice in the process。 Dr。 Kahneman also discusses bias in the process， as it's different from errors， but equally generates unfair results。 The book recommend a set of suggestions and processes to reduce noise。 Although it's imp Daniel Kahneman discusses the judgement process that is pervasive on our life - from formal trials results to doctors bringing their diagnostic on your headache， there are a lot， a lot of noise in the process to bring results on those scenarios， generating errors and injustice in the process。 Dr。 Kahneman also discusses bias in the process， as it's different from errors， but equally generates unfair results。 The book recommend a set of suggestions and processes to reduce noise。 Although it's impossible to eliminate the noise， reducing it would generate better outcomes。 The book is long and repeats itself， but makes a clear point on why we must work to reduce noise， from repetitive decisions to single， one of a kind ones。 。。。more
D。J。
，
The Mediating Assessments Protocol （Chapter 25） is Worth the Price of AdmissionThis is a long and tough book。 If you work in corporate at the executive level， I might suggest you buy this book only to read Chapter 25。 The topic of Chapter 25 is Mediating Assessments Protocol （which is an unfortunate name）。 Unlike much of the rest of book， I found this chapter highly engaging。Under what conditions would I use the MAP technique？ If you work at an insurance company， work in Mergers and Acquisitions The Mediating Assessments Protocol （Chapter 25） is Worth the Price of AdmissionThis is a long and tough book。 If you work in corporate at the executive level， I might suggest you buy this book only to read Chapter 25。 The topic of Chapter 25 is Mediating Assessments Protocol （which is an unfortunate name）。 Unlike much of the rest of book， I found this chapter highly engaging。Under what conditions would I use the MAP technique？ If you work at an insurance company， work in Mergers and Acquisitions or invest in start-ups， you would definitely benefit from MAP。Basically， MAP is a process which will deliver far more accurate decisions。 And since more accurate decisions over time in these situations will result in making or saving millions of dollars， someone on your team should check it out。The MAP implements the following techniques:1。 sequencing information2。 structuring the decision into independent assessments3。 using a common frame of reference grounded in the outside view4。 aggregating the independent judgments of multiple individuals。 。。。more
Lupo Benatti
，
Great book， it could have been more concise。
Elithrion
，
One of my favorite rationality-type books。 Tries hard to be practical， and to some extent succeeds， imo。
Yash Sakhuja
，
"Whenever there is human judgement， there is noise and much more than what you can think of。" A book that every decision maker should read atleast once。 New discoveries and the best of Kahneman's work providing answers to complex problems。 "Whenever there is human judgement， there is noise and much more than what you can think of。" A book that every decision maker should read atleast once。 New discoveries and the best of Kahneman's work providing answers to complex problems。 。。。more
Brad Rose
，
This seems mostly useful for those in management or making decisions based on judgement that are full of themselves。 It provides procedures and suggestions for better processes to remove the noise that the individual is likely not aware of。The ones who have the most to reflect on or work to modify processes are those who think like:"I'm a judge and I provide well though out judgements that are fair""I know how to conduct interviews well to determine who is the best candidate for the job"They pro This seems mostly useful for those in management or making decisions based on judgement that are full of themselves。 It provides procedures and suggestions for better processes to remove the noise that the individual is likely not aware of。The ones who have the most to reflect on or work to modify processes are those who think like:"I'm a judge and I provide well though out judgements that are fair""I know how to conduct interviews well to determine who is the best candidate for the job"They probably aren't quite doing as good as they think due to noise that they may not be consciously aware of。 。。。more
Eliisa Kallioniemi
，
Hyödyllistä luettavaa kaikille päätöksiä tekeville。 Oli huojentavaa oivaltaa， miten inhimillisiä väärät päätökset ovat。 Amerikkalaiseen tapaan kaikki tärkeä toistetaan monta kertaa。 Äänikirjassa sokerina pohjalla kiinnostava tekijöiden haastattelu。
James Mason
，
Oof。 It took me a long time to figure out what I don't like about this book。 Still not sure I got it。 The main message here is an interesting one。 It's thoroughly presented。 Lots of diverse examples are given to illustrate points and practical consequences。 What it seems to lack is personality。 It reads nearly like a scientific paper （and even as a scientist， that is not a style I am looking for in book form） or a textbook。 The audiobook narrator may have exacerbated the problem; something about Oof。 It took me a long time to figure out what I don't like about this book。 Still not sure I got it。 The main message here is an interesting one。 It's thoroughly presented。 Lots of diverse examples are given to illustrate points and practical consequences。 What it seems to lack is personality。 It reads nearly like a scientific paper （and even as a scientist， that is not a style I am looking for in book form） or a textbook。 The audiobook narrator may have exacerbated the problem; something about the way he read it also made it seem devoid of personality。 I ended up cranking it up to 2。5x just to get through it。 If I'd been reading it， I probably would've had to give up。 Still， I give it more than one star because of all the positives I mentioned above。 。。。more
Richard Edbury
，
Excellently researched and written book but on a topic that is somewhat dull and not especially relevant to me。 If this topic impacts you this book is highly recommended。
Petros Cheretakis
，
As the other of Kahneman book after finishing this one I was eager to reread it。 Chapters: Value of the Normal and conclusion invaluable。 Already re-read them
A。M。
，
I had real trouble getting into this。 It seemed to me that they were looking for complex reasons for varied results when a lot of it is racism and privilege。 I used to be a lawyer and worked at Legal Aid in the criminal section， and in my experience clients got very different sentences than my peers did for the same offences。 I kind of gave up on it， and my library loan expired。 So I do not know if they got more into it。did not finish at 14%
Nathan Perkins
，
If I could write this book on multiple categories I would give it a five star for its importance。 Kehneman has found a subject it has implications for many fields where judgment is vitally important。 How to make better judgments。The book read like a textbook that would be used in an office setting to prepare employees to make better decisions。 This would be an appropriate use of the material。I did find the material unnecessarily redundant and elementary。 I felt it could have been approached in a If I could write this book on multiple categories I would give it a five star for its importance。 Kehneman has found a subject it has implications for many fields where judgment is vitally important。 How to make better judgments。The book read like a textbook that would be used in an office setting to prepare employees to make better decisions。 This would be an appropriate use of the material。I did find the material unnecessarily redundant and elementary。 I felt it could have been approached in a much simpler manner。 。。。more
Said
，
Huge disappointment after "Thinking， Fast and Slow。" The book is unnecessarily long and full of technical statistical details that probably most people will not care about。 It was really a huge disappointment after Thinking， Fast and Slow" which was very accessible and full of interesting insights。I do think that the book had a lot of interesting insights but it could have easily been an article instead of an entire book （or at least a shorter book）。 Despite many （rightful） negative comments， I Huge disappointment after "Thinking， Fast and Slow。" The book is unnecessarily long and full of technical statistical details that probably most people will not care about。 It was really a huge disappointment after Thinking， Fast and Slow" which was very accessible and full of interesting insights。I do think that the book had a lot of interesting insights but it could have easily been an article instead of an entire book （or at least a shorter book）。 Despite many （rightful） negative comments， I still think it's worth a quick read。 。。。more
Emilie22
，
3。5 stars。I read and loved Thinking Fast and Slow by Kahneman and got a lot more out of that book than this。 I have to admit that I struggled more than I expected with the definition of noise and difference between noise and bias。 I understand on a cognitive level that bias is inconsistency and noise is unreliability but failed to fully be convinced of the "so what。" I do appreciate the structure in which this and Thinking Fast and Slow are written; others have criticized the thoughtfulness of t 3。5 stars。I read and loved Thinking Fast and Slow by Kahneman and got a lot more out of that book than this。 I have to admit that I struggled more than I expected with the definition of noise and difference between noise and bias。 I understand on a cognitive level that bias is inconsistency and noise is unreliability but failed to fully be convinced of the "so what。" I do appreciate the structure in which this and Thinking Fast and Slow are written; others have criticized the thoughtfulness of the research and uniqueness of the conclusions。 I did get value out of the appendixes which sounds funny， even as I type that。I got enough out of this book as I'm interested in psych/behavioral econ， but it's definitely not for everyone and I can see how it could have been better executed。 。。。more
Miriam
，
This book starts out enormously interesting and thought-provoking， though I thought that it somewhat repetitive towards the end （took me maybe a week to get through the first 2/3 and three weeks to get through the last 1/3）。 Still， Kahneman， Sibony， and Sunstein is an incredible collaboration。
Scott Martin
，